About Me

Name: alfredlester
Loading...

Treasury removes cap for Fannie and Freddie aid

NEW YORK – The government has handed its ATM card to beleaguered mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Treasury Department said Thursday it removed the $400 billion financial cap it will provide to keep the companies from failing. Already, taxpayers have shelled out $111 billion to the pair.

Treasury Department officials said the $400 billion limit would be replaced with a flexible formula to ensure the two agencies can stand behind the billions of dollars in mortgage-backed securities they sell to investors.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provide vital liquidity to the mortgage industry by purchasing home loans from lenders and selling them to investors. Together, they own or guarantee almost 31 million home loans worth about $5.5 trillion, or about half of all mortgages.

Without government aid, the firms would have gone broke, leaving millions of people unable to get a mortgage.

The biggest headwind facing the housing recovery has been the rise in foreclosures as unemployment remains high. The Treasury's latest move could allow Fannie and Freddie to play a bigger role in restructuring mortgages for troubled borrowers.

The news follows the announcement Thursday that Fannie's and Freddie's chief executives could get paid as much as $6 million for 2009, despite the companies' dismal performances this year.

Fannie's CEO, Michael Williams, and Freddie CEO Charles "Ed" Haldeman Jr. each will receive $900,000 in salary, $3.1 million in deferred payments next year and another $2 million if they meet certain performance goals, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The pay packages were approved by the Treasury Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates Fannie and Freddie.

That pay is far less than what their predecessors earned. Former Fannie CEO Daniel Mudd received $10.2 million in 2008 and former Freddie CEO Richard Syron pocketed $13.1 million. Both execs were ousted when federal regulators seized the companies in September 2008. The federal government blocked exit packages for the pair worth up to $24 million.

The chief executives' pay could spark new criticism about the government's numerous bailouts, but that may be unfounded, said Mark Borges, principal with management consulting firm Compensia.

Haldeman and Williams each could command between $5 million and $10 million in a similar position in the private sector, Borges estimated, and without the notable challenges and public scrutiny they face at these companies.

"I doubt too many people would look at these jobs and say, 'Gosh, I would love to go there for my next career move,'" Borges said instant payday loans. "The government is getting top notch executives to solve problems that are not easy to solve."

The bulk of their pay is also not guaranteed, Borges said, so these executives can't pocket and run and must meet certain long-term goals or risk giving some of it back.

Freddie Mac's board sets the performance goals for the chief executive, which won't be disclosed until next year. Fannie Mae's filing outlined its corporate goals including "being a recognized leader in the housing recovery," "protecting taxpayers," and "managing risk more effectively."

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac declined to offer further details on CEO performance goals.

Public anger over Wall Street pay boiled over earlier this year. In response, the Obama administration imposed pay curbs on banks that received government bailouts. All the major banks have since repaid their federal money, largely to escape caps on executive pay.

Former Bank of America Corp. CEO Ken Lewis, for example, agreed to forgo his salary and bonus this year under pressure from the government. Last year, he pocketed more than $9 million in total compensation. Bank of America received $45 billion in government assistance, which it has since repaid.

Freddie Mac hired Haldeman, a former mutual fund executive, in July. At the time, the company disclosed his annual salary of $900,000 but did not disclose other incentive payments. In September, the company hired a new chief financial officer, Ross Kari, and said his pay package would be worth up to $5.5 million.

Williams, formerly Fannie Mae's chief operating officer, took over as CEO in April after the first government-appointed CEO, Herbert Allison, took a job at the Treasury Department. Williams earned a base salary of $676,000 last year, plus a retention award of $260,000.

Washington-based Fannie Mae was created in 1938 in the aftermath of the Great Depression. It was privatized 30 years later to limit budget deficits during the Vietnam War. In 1970, the government formed its sibling and competitor McLean, Va.-based Freddie Mac.

Though the Obama administration has yet to divulge its long-term plans for the two companies, they are unlikely to return to their former power and influence.

___

AP Real Estate Reporter Alan Zibel in Washington contributed to this report.

Treasury removes cap for Fannie and Freddie aid

Hot News: MGIC shares drop after lawsuit disclosure
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How to Hire Reputable Contractors

Homeowners often complain of projects that cost more than estimated, delays, low-quality workmanship, miscommunications, and outright scams, all of which can pack a wallop to your wallet.

While due diligence isn&&9;t a guarantee that your home repair experience will be stress-free, it&&9;s the best way to protect yourself from these nightmares.

Perhaps a friend or neighbor recommended a repair person, or maybe you found one via an online forum or in the phone book. Remember that a recommendation is just the first step in securing reputable help. Do be sure that you also keep these important things in mind:

1. Ask the service professional you are considering to provide references. You&&9;ll want to contact at least two other sources who can confirm a job well done.

2. Make sure whoever you hire has adequate insurance (both general liability and worker&&9;s compensation) to cover any mishaps in your home. Otherwise you may be liable for the coverage if the unthinkable happens.

3. Check to see that your prospective contractor has professional credentials and affiliations. A contractor who is affiliated with organizations in his or her field is more likely to stay abreast of new developments in their area of expertise, as well as having access to the professional resources available to members. Your job is safer in the hands of someone who is in the field as a career, rather than simply trying out a new sideline.

Often, you&&9;ll see the words "licensed, bonded, and insured" in advertisements for home fix-it professionals. Licensing refers to a professional registration with a governing body (like a state) that typically requires the contractor to adhere to certain standards business cards. If a contractor is bonded, it means he or she has set aside funds in an account that is secured by the state; these funds are made available should a consumer win a claim against a company. And again, insurance is an important safeguard for your protection (as well as the company&&9;s) should anything go terribly wrong.

4. Find a home pro who accepts credit cards. Paying by credit card affords you much greater protection than cash or check in case you are dissatisfied with a job.

5. Get it all in writing. Make sure your estimate details each part of the work to be done, what kind/quality of materials will be used, who is responsible for supplying the materials, and a comprehensive cost breakdown so you can see exactly for what services you&&9;ll be paying.

6. Reward longevity. Many years in the business means that many more previous customers you can contact for a recommendation.

Of course, no one can guarantee that the home repairs you hire out will be problem-free, but taking these steps is as close as you can get to ensuring quality workmanship. That&&9;s peace of mind you can take all the way to the bank.

For more Foolishness:

What Will Be the Best Stock for 2010?The Greatest Stocks of the Next GenerationBuy These Stocks Before Wall Street Catches On

How to Hire Reputable Contractors

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

London Markets: British stocks gain for fourth straight session

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- British stocks tentatively built on recent gains in a holiday-shortened trading session on Thursday, with miners advancing amid higher commodity prices

The U.K. FTSE 100 index rose 0.1%, or 5.22 points, to 5,377.60.

The British stock market and selected Continental equity markets close early on Thursday for the Christmas break. Shares trading in Europe on Thursday were also in a tight range. See Europe Markets.

U.S. stock futures were pointing to mild gains on Wall Street.

The FTSE 100 index ended 0.8% higher on Wednesday, with the move bringing gains made in the first three sessions of the week to 3.4% and year-to-date gains to 21.2%.

The index is almost back at its 2009 closing high of 5,382.67, hit on Nov. 16.

Miners have performed strongly this year and were higher again on Thursday, with BHP Billiton shares up 1 low cost payday loans.4% and Anglo American shares up 1.2%.

Silver miner Fresnillo gained 2.6% and copper miner Kazakhmys advanced 1.2%.

The gains for the sector came as metal futures advanced, with gold futures up $10.10 at $1,104.20 an ounce. Light sweet crude oil futures were up 18 cents at $76.85 a barrel in electronic trading and sterling traded up 0.2% at $1.5993 against the dollar.

Still, gains for the top London index were kept in check by losses for some banks and insurance companies.

RSA Insurance Group shares were down 1.4% and shares of banking giant HSBC Holdings lost 0.7%.

London Markets: British stocks gain for fourth straight session

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »