About Me

Name: alfredlester
Loading...

Company Abandoning pipeline project in Alaska

JUNEAU, Alaska - One of Two Major Companies planning to build natural gas pipelines in Alaska has Dropped ITS BID Tuesday Saying That It didn&&9;t Secure The Support Necessary to justify going forward With STI project.

The announcement from Denali-The Alaska Gas Pipeline Questions Raised About the prospects for building a long-hoped-for line in Alaska. For Years, Alaskans Have Dreamed Of A gas line as a way to help shore up revenue as oil production declines, create jobs and Provide a more reliable source of energy. Goal In The Denali Cited exchange market - lower gas prices, The Rise of North American shale - as making it tough to get The Commitments Needed to move forward THEY.

Denali Venture HAD Been Competing With A plan to build a line TransCanada Corp., Which Says It Is Continuing efforts to move forward icts project. TransCanada has progressed with State Financial Support, Something Denali never Received.A company official, Scott Jepsen, Does not Believe It Would Have Made a Difference In The Denali decision.

Like TransCanada, Denali has-been working last year to secure sincere shipping Necessary agreements to advance ITS project. Purpose Jepsen Said It Was not Successful in doing so and Denali WAS ITS cutting losses.

To keep going, Denali Would Have Needed firm transportation agreements in excess of $ 100 Billion and Transportation Commitments of at least 20 Years For A Line That Would not Be in Service Until at least 2020, Said Jepsen, Denali&&9;s vice president of business services.

"It Came Time to Make the business decision to discontinuous" the project, he Told The Associated Press.

Denali Reported Spending over $ 165 million in Pursuing the project.In a statement, President Bud Fackrell Denali Said The company "could not Spend The trillion dollars of Necessary to Advance The Project Without binding Agreements with shippers.

Denali, a joint venture of BP PLC and ConocoPhillips, HAD ITS Estimated project cost $ 35 Would Have trillion. Both TransCanada and Denali HAD Proposed Plans to Be in Service by 2020 about 4.5 and Deliver about one billion cubic feet of gas per day from Alaska&&9;s North Slope to North American Market by larger lines to Canada.

While Jepsen Specific Concerns Could how Raised by shippers in negotiations, Citing confidentialité, He Said today&&9;s market conditions arent a secret.

He declined, to speculate whether he is a major line Believes Will move forward in Alaska.Given Denali has Always Been That cast as a market-driven project, He Said He Does not Believe icts Project Would Have Had It fared any better state Financial Support Received.

Under the 2007 Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, championed by then-Gov. Sarah Palin, TransCanada won year exclusive license to Pursue a project, Meaning it got the pledge of up to $ 500 million in state aid to aussi Had To Meet certain benchmarks. (TransCanada is Working With Exxon Mobil Corp No teletrak payday loan.. Icts project to advance.)

On Tuesday, TransCanada&&9;s Tony Palmer&&9;s decision Denali Said Had No Effect is TransCanada&&9;s activities. He Said His company WAS making progress and has resolved Nearly All the issues it has With Customers. He Said Some Of The Others - Including Resolutions on Disputed leases and long-term certainty is royalty and tax issues - are out of control icts and Needs To Be Dealt With By The State And The gas companies.

Lawmakers are antsy to see results from TransCanada.There Was "during the legislative session talk about seeking" to cut ties Possibly With The company Yew Were not Reached agreements sometime this year. On Tuesday, at least Two House Republicans That Renewed debate: Speaker Mike Chenault, Who Said Denali&&9;s announcement Was a "clear signal" that state Needs to focus was gas to serve Alaska&&9;s Needs, and Rep. Mike Hawker, Who Said There&&9;s No Reason To Believe the Circumstances facings are Denali Any Different Than Those Facing TransCanada.

Hawker Said It&&9;s Time the state stop "wasting more time, money and effort" on the staff line "under the Inducement Act.

Larry Persily, Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, Said The Gas Line Is too important to Alaska&&9;s economy to give up on it. He Said U.S.Natural Gas Market are well-supplied In The near-term goal That Could change as utilities turn to natural gas.

"Our economy IS wrapped up in Oil and Gas, and it&&9;s not looking real good on oil production," he said. Whether by "2020, 2025, it does not matter. We need (a major gas line)," he Added.

He Said Officials Should Be Doing Everything possible - Including HAVING The State, TransCanada and Gas Producers - sit down together to see what, EXACTLY, It Will Take to get a project moving.

Alaska Gov.. Sean Parnell Said There Was A "silver lining" to Denali&&9;s announcement: it allow ConocoPhillips and BP to partner In Another gas line project.

"While The Competition That drove progress this important project is has-been welcome, it has Always Been Universally Understood That Would Be Only One project built," he said.

Representatives of BP and ConocoPhillips in Alaska Said Their companies are looking for Ways to Bring Alaska gas to market.

BP Alaska Spokesman Steve Rinehart declined, to say whether The Company HAD Either bid on the pipeline project. Purpose He Said There HAD been "active negotiations" with or to.

ConocoPhillips year initial bid HAD Submitted On The Denali project. Spokeswoman Natalie Lowman Declined to say whether It Was Involved in Talks On The TransCanada project.

Company Abandoning pipeline project in Alaska

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive